Friday, December 2, 2016

China selfie app eyes big IPO

They say a picture's worth a thousand words. How about $710 million?

China's Meitu selfie app is hoping to raise that much by selling shares for the first time. It said Friday it would price its initial public offering between 4.9 billion and 5.5 billion Hong Kong dollars ($632 million-$710 million).
The top end of the price range would value the company at $4.5 billion, Reuters has reported.
Meitu promotes what it calls "beautification" apps.
The company's photo and video sharing apps are popular in China and other Asian countries for their slick Photoshop features -- users can edit selfies to make themselves look paler, slimmer or taller.
The company even sells a smartphone tailored to selfie addicts that comes with two cameras -- one on the back, the other on the front.
Find whole article here: China selfie app eyes big IPO

Wednesday, November 30, 2016

Role of Central Bankers in U.K. Changes as Fiscal Policy Blurs with Monetary Policy

Similarly to the U.S., at the peak of the financial crisis the U.K. eased monetary policy to balance aggregate demand. Interest rates remain low and side effects of the the U.K.'s easing procedure caused future monetary easing to be limited. Then the only option seems to be fiscal policy. Government borrowing to fund infrastructure helps boost demand when there is uncertainty and strengthens supply. This shift of focus to fiscal policy should not take away from the importance of the job of central bankers. Central bankers have added responsibilities since the crisis such as new macroprudential instruments like bank stress tests which improves the strength of the financial sector. The Bank of England is now responsible for supervising the bank system. Also with interest rates close to zero and QE, the distinction between fiscal and monetary policy become entwined. Easing fiscal policy is supported by central bank purchases of sovereign debt. These new responsibilities involve the central bank in more controversial issues. A new social contract between central banks and society is needed because they don't just aim to control price levels with interest rates anymore, they purchased over £500 billion of gilt as part of its QE program which aided the chancellor in decision making.



http://0-web.a.ebscohost.com.dewey2.library.denison.edu/ehost/detail/detail?sid=eb74af1c-ddd0-47f2-bd70-762c20458424%40sessionmgr4010&vid=0&hid=4112&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=7EH119762232&db=nfh

Consumer confidence index hits highest since July 2007

Consumers had a more optimistic outlook about the economy in November, according to a monthly survey. The Consumer Confidence Index hit 107.1 in November, when economists only expected the consumer confidence index to be 101.2. This was up from 98.6 in October. This shows an improvement since October and is once again at pre-recession levels. The survey measures confidence toward business conditions, short-term outlook, personal finances and jobs. The majority of consumers were surveyed before the presidential election, however, it appeared from the post-election sample that optimism was not impacted by the outcome. The report did state that the proportion expecting more jobs in the months ahead was unchanged at 14.5%, but those anticipating fewer jobs fell to 13.8% from 16.6%.

http://www.cnbc.com/2016/11/29/consumer-confidence-for-november-2016.html


Small Business Stocks Surge


Since the election on November 7th there has been some interesting changes in the investor sentiment. President-Elect Donald Trump's promise of a strong dollar is coming true without his administration actually implementing any policy. Well of course there is no implementation since he is not yet in office you say, and that just goes to show the power of words and a self-fulfilling prophecy. The market is already showing positives for small businesses and their stock. One example is the Russel 2000, an index for small businesses, that has risen 12% just in the past three weeks. This advantageous jump is supported by the US dollar's over 3% rise in value since the election and the planned policies changes of the Trump administration.

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/small-us-companies-win-big-post-election-stocks-190218390.html

Tuesday, November 29, 2016

OPEC Deadlocked as Iran, Saudis Harden Positions on Oil Deal

    This article really sums up how OPEC can not come to an agreement on how much they are going to cut down on production. Some OPEC countries are in an agreement on how much they should reduce production, but others do not agree, which is why the agreement has not been finalized.

Iran and Iraq are not in agreement with the current production cut because they have had sanctions, which they do not believe OPEC is taking into account. Saudi Arabia does not agree with this cut in production because they believe that all members need to participate in this production cut. The two members that are not participating in the production cut are Libya and Nigeria. Indonesia's energy minister said that he really doesn't know if an agreement will be finalized because the feelings between all the countries are so mixed.

If OPEC does come to an agreement and decides to cut production, then this will have an extreme positive effect on United States oil companies. This cut in production will increase oil prices, which means we will look to invest more money into United States oil companies, which could increase employment. It will be interesting to see what Trumps plan is to help the oil industry in the United States, as the dramatic decrease in oil prices a few years ago really hurt that industry, as many oil companies were forced to shut down.


Link: http://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/opec-deadlocked-as-iran-saudis-harden-positions-on-oil-deal/ar-AAkUPnm


Monday, November 28, 2016

Energy Firms Step Up Business Investment

Although business investment has been low overall in the past several years, the oil and gas sectors have been especially weak, with near zero investment growth since 2014. Crude oil prices plummeted in that year, forcing energy firms to cut spending across the board, but particularly investment. Prices seemed to have reached their bottom for the time being, however, and have gone up mildly. Oil and gas firms are now starting to grow their investment just slightly, but even increases by just a few hundred million dollars show an important rebound in expectations. If prices stay where they are or begin to increase more, investment is planned to rise commensurately. This could have some important ripple effects in the economy, such as increased business for manufacturing firms that help to produce oil rigs and other technology. I think another important contributing factor to energy sector investment growth is the vision of a Trump presidency. Trump has had a reliably pro-US energy message, and if he decides to loosen regulations, thus lowering firms' costs, and sign off on more pipeline projects, the prospects for growth in the American energy sector significantly improve.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/energy-firms-step-up-business-investment-1480329000

U.S. existing home sales hit more than 9.5-year high

U.S. home resales rose to their highest level in over 9.5 years during October, offering more evidence of a rise in economic growth in the fourth quarter; however, a recent surge in mortgage rates could slow this housing market activity.

According to the National Association of Realtors, on Tuesday existing home sales rose 2.0 percent to an annual rate of 5.6 million units last month. This is the highest level since February 2007 when rates were at 5.49 million units. Reports came out last week that showed a surge in housing as well as strong reports on retail sales and labor markets suggesting the economy continued to gain speed quickly in the fourth quarter.

Mortgage rates have been watched carefully since the election. This showed that the fixed 30-year mortgage rate has increased about 40 basis points to an average 3.94 percent, according to data from mortgage finance firm Freddie Mac.

To read the full article click here.

Sunday, November 27, 2016

China’s economic problems will come to a head in 2017

This article talks about the future of China’s economy because of its debt issue (increasing debt: equity ratio), escalating property prices, and the concern raised because of Donald Trump’s claim to impose tariffs on imported Chinese goods.

The Chinese rely heavily on low cost exports, which have suddenly declined, and an external shock like a trade war with the United States would worsen their trade balance in the future, decreasing net exports. China’s overall debt has substantially increased because of the fiscal and monetary stimulus, by increasing spending and lowering interest rates to increase overall credit in the economy. Corporate debt has increased, along with bankruptcies, low industrial profits, decreasing returns on investments, and a slowdown in the real estate sector.

The Chinese economy has heavily depended on fixed investments like roads, railways, and housing. As cheap exports have declined and household consumption of goods and services have continued to slide, this fixed investment is the reason for China’s economic growth and employment. The vast majority of Beijing’s investment has been financed by debt in the form of loans, bonds, or other types of lending. Therefore, the debt in China is used for financing different fixed investments like the costs of land, roads, railways, etc.
2016 has brought a stronger growth in China’s property sector, but it has largely been concentrated in the wealthiest cities and has been induced at the expense of creating more available credit. The future of China’s housing sector looks bleak because of the substantial upward pressure on housing prices, which will lead to lags in real estate investment and construction.

Their debt to equity ratios have been rising since the 2008 financial crisis. Chinese companies in the construction sector, concentrated in northern and central China, might not be able to repay their debt, and in turn, declare bankruptcy next year.
There is a high risk of uncertainty in the Chinese economy. There is an over-dependence on housing and construction, and the United States president elect of Donald Trump creates uncertainty on Chinese exports because of his statement to impose tariffs on imports of Chinese goods. Trump vowed to enact a 45% tax on Chinese goods, which seems unrealistic, but even small tariffs imposed on Chinese goods would damage the Chinese economy in the long run. 

A tax on Chinese exports to the United States would lead to a decrease in consumption of Chinese goods, and an increased consumption of locally produced goods, since they are cheaper. This could negatively harm companies in China, who would have to cut down on production, along with a decrease in revenue, due to the decreasing demand of Chinese products by US locals. This might thereby lead the Chinese government to increase purchases and domestic spending in order for companies and different corporations to continue operating. An increase in purchases leads to decreased national saving, which would reduce net exports, along with a rise in the exchange rate.  

Overall, 2017 is proving to be a difficult year for China, and it will be interesting to see the impact of the tariff on trade between China and the United States, its effect on the GDP and Labor Force Participation/unemployment rate, the level of inflation, and the different measures the Chinese government will impose to continue to maintain a healthy economy in the long run.





Paying for Trump's Infrastructure

Throughout the election there were very few things that both Clinton and Trump agreed upon, a deficit in infrastructure was one of them. Both agreed that the nation's power, water, and sewerage facilities were outdated and would be unable to keep up with the country's growing population. President elect Trump has openly stated a 1 trillion dollar infrastructure improvement plan. This sounds awesome in the sense that  it has become apparent that the country needs it, but the question that still remains to be unanswered is: who is going to pay for it? Clearly tax increases are off the table with since Trump has argued to cut taxes as well as having a Republican dominated congress. 

An interesting idea for funding these infrastructure improvements would be to use public pensions, which have around 3.8 trillion in assets. The current environment in which this pensions are invested are not likely to produce the desired 7 percent return. If infrastructure investments could prove to have relatively high and safe returns, it could be a way to both get the funding for improving infrastructure and additionally improving pension payouts. 

An example of infrastructure investment could be in the form of highway tolls. Pension funds are invested into improving the highway quality and the implementation of tolls would provide funds for interest payments to the pensions. In other countries this tactic has been put to use quiet successfully. In 2011, an Australian pension fund took over a motorway and since then the motorway has improved in quality greatly and the pension fun has made a large profit. 



http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Columns/2016/11/14/Who-s-Going-Pay-Trump-s-Huge-Infrastructure-Plans

Saturday, November 26, 2016

Economy needs higher oil prices: Goldman Sachs

OPEC is closing in on a deal to cut production, which will surely cause oil prices to rise. Oil is already almost back to $50 per barrel, so cuts of nearly 1 million barrels per day could boost prices well into the mid-$50s, even up towards $60 per barrel. That will provide a windfall to oil producers around the world and the sacrifice for OPEC members will be more than paid for by higher revenues. For example, Iraqi officials say that for every $1 increase in the price of a barrel of oil, their revenues jump by $1 billion per year.

As a result, the odds of rising crude oil prices are high. But while that could be welcomed by the industry, consumers might not be as excited to see cheap gasoline disappear. After all, U.S. motorists have enjoyed two years of incredibly cheap fuel. Will rising oil prices put a dent in already tepid U.S and global economic growth?

Goldman says that the surplus in savings outside the U.S. ballooned from $1 trillion to $7 trillion between 2001 and 2014, pushing up asset prices. Of course, that can also have a darker side – asset bubbles in commodities as well as housing also led to widespread financial ruin.


All in all, the research from Goldman Sachs suggests that, while it may not be obvious to individual consumers who see higher prices at the pump, there could be a boost to the global economy in the coming months if oil prices rise.


http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2016/11/26/economy-oil-prices-goldman-sachs/94431546/