Farmers Facing Consequences of Trade War

Many farmers are in urgent need of financial assistance, especially soybean producers, in response to tariffs. High inflation, interest rates, and immigration policies have already created labor deficits and risen prices of fertilizer, seeds, and equipment. The world’s largest soybean buyer, China, has reverted to purchasing from Brazil- refusing to buy U.S. soybeans. To put it in perspective, nearly sixty percent of North Dakota's soybeans are routinely purchased by China. Therefore, many farming businesses have extremely restricted cash flow in absence of demand.The majority have considered selling off other produce inventory to store soybeans in hopes of a soon-to-come tariff deal.

It is necessary for our government to find a solution for this year's harvest, likely either a farmer bailout or ending the trade war. This raises an apparent issue, tariffs restrict net exports and imports. In class we learned that services is the U.S.'s greatest export, but it would be negligent to ignore the detrimental situation loyal U.S. producers are already in. Why would businesses want to move their production to U.S. soil if industries like farming are already struggling?

https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/20/politics/us-farmers-trump-tariffs-dire-consequences?iid=cnn_buildContentRecirc_end_recirc&recs_exp=up-next-article-end&tenant_id=related.en

America's Tariffs Not Hurting Chinese Trade; Thriving Instead

Since Trump's return to office, he has been looking to isolate China in the trade world. He called them America's biggest trade rival but his results have been somewhat mixed. In the process of trying to isolate China, they have retaliated with their own tariffs in other parts of the world including the EU, India, Malaysia and Vietnam. 

China has began to shift their production to ASEAN (Association of South-East Asian Nations) and this has led to exports to the U.S. to decrease. Overall trade is also up in Europe, Africa, and Southeast Asia, which is led by Belt and Road projects. Not only is it not going all so well for the U.S. but a continuing down this path could very well hurt its global position in trade. 

If you were making policies, would you focus more on protecting American industries or on cooperating with China? 

https://www.economist.com/finance-and-economics/2025/09/09/chinese-trade-is-thriving-despite-americas-attacks

National Income: Paying Work, Not Capital

 https://democracyjournal.org/magazine/29/national-income-paying-work-not-capital/

 In this article, Bruce Bartlett states that a smaller share of national income is flowing to labor, but larger shares are going to capital. The problem with this is that inequality will continue to grow and consumer demand will decrease because workers drive consumption. In order to correct this problem, Bartlett believes that a tax reform that re-balances support towards labor will help this problem. One example of re-balancing, would be to allow for more deductions for worker-related expenses. Bartlett doesn't believe that this solution will gain any traction in the current political climate. 

This article reiterates that problems with wealth inequality and the diminishing middle class. Too much income is going to the capital owners, not into increased wages. I think given the current political climate, we need more ideas to correct the problems, that may actually pass through as policy. 

Trump’s $100,000 H-1B fee sparks a global race to grab top talent

President Trump’s proclamation imposing a $100,000 fee on new H-1B visa applications between September 2025 and September 2026 represents a significant change to U.S. immigration policy. The fee applies only to first-time petitions, not renewals, and aims to reduce reliance on foreign workers while prioritizing domestic hiring, particularly in the technology sector. Critics argue that the policy could deter skilled applicants, raise labor costs, and negatively affect innovation and competitiveness, especially for smaller firms and startups that rely on international talent. Industry leaders have warned of potential profit margin squeezes and disruptions in hiring plans, while supporters say the measure will encourage companies to use visas more selectively for high-value positions. The announcement has already impacted markets, with shares of major Indian IT firms declining and U.S. tech companies reassessing their workforce strategies. Analysts predict this fee could reshape global talent flows and add complexity to corporate planning in the coming year.

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/09/22/h-1b-visa-what-trumps-100000-fee-means-for-top-global-talent-hubs.html