The rule of law is key to capitalism − eroding it is bad news for American business
This article stood out to me, especially since I rarely use The Conversation US as a source. However, the author’s background makes the piece credible. Robert Bird, a professor of business law and ethics at the University of Connecticut, builds his argument on real world experience of how law affects business decisions, rather than focusing solely on politics or ideology.
Bird’s main point is that capitalism depends on a strict and predictable rule of law, and I found this convincing because he links legal principles directly to economic outcomes. Rather than simply arguing for more or less regulation, he highlights the need for consistency and fair enforcement. He explains that chaotic deregulation, with sudden rule changes and selective enforcement, can damage investor confidence, make long-term planning difficult, and increase business costs. This made me rethink the common belief that less regulation always leads to more growth.
I also found his use of data and global comparisons effective. Bird uses World Justice Project rankings to show that the U.S. now falls behind several other countries in rule-of-law strength. This makes his argument more concrete and shows that legal instability can harm global competitiveness. His discussion of trade agreements, property rights, and contract enforcement shows how legal uncertainty can weaken markets and discourage both domestic and foreign investment.
Another strong part of the article is its link between legal uncertainty and the job market. Bird explains that unpredictable legal and political situations are causing talented people to leave the U.S., showing that the harm goes beyond just companies and affects workers, too. The examples of more job applications abroad and growing interest in foreign citizenship show that instability in the rule of law changes where people want to. Overall, the article argues well that “smart regulation” does not block capitalism but actually helps it. Bird supports his points with business law, data, and real-world examples, showing that weakening the rule of law harms innovation, investment, and economic freedom. Even though I do not usually read this publication, the author’s expertise and clear argument made the article convincing and relevant.
https://theconversation.com/the-rule-of-law-is-key-to-capitalism-eroding-it-is-bad-news-for-american-business-254922
One thing that stands out to me is that when the rule of law weakens, it tends to hurt small and mid-sized businesses the most, since they don’t have the legal teams or resources to navigate constant uncertainty. In that sense, instability doesn’t just slow growth, it can actually reduce competition by giving larger firms an advantage. That makes protecting consistent and fair enforcement essential so it is fair between all sized businesses.
ReplyDeleteThis is interesting to think about. In the past few decades in U.S politics, there has been a general consensus that the economy and businesses would do better with less government regulation. That statements appears to make sense but your article provides great support against this claim. Having consistent laws and regulations allows for more certainty in the market and without it the markets would be in a very poor place
ReplyDelete