California’s High-Speed Railway (HSR) project comprises two phases. The first connects San Francisco to LA, and the second connects the other major cities to the railway network. Currently, the section in the Central Valley is under construction, connecting Madera to Bakersfield and the cities in between.
Recently, President Trump has launched a review on the project to see if it will be completed. This review has been justifiable as the new projected budget has increased from the 2008 $33 Billion to the new $89-128 Billion. Additionally, the project has been subjected to frequent delays, and will continue to have them as a “report found it is unlikely to reach the target of shuttling the first phase passengers by 2033” (Adler, 2025). The fate of its completion may rest upon the current party occupying the Whitehouse, as democrats are offered financial support for the railway system, and Trump has been accused of trying to terminate the project
I Personally believe that the project must be completed, as this investment will bring a substantial boost to the US’s largest economy, and will cover all development costs. Furthermore, the railway will bring benefits that come with any railway, such as reduced road traffic volume and pollution, faster way of transportation, cheaper, and a safer alternative to cars. Lastly, if the project does reach completion, it may inspire other states around the country and create a nationwide reform on transportation.
References:
https://hsr.ca.gov/high-speed-rail-in-california/overview/
https://www.visualcapitalist.com/visualizing-americas-29-trillion-economy-by-state/
This is an interesting article that I did not know about. I wonder, what are some ways that can ensure the completion of this project irrespective of the party in office? Additionally, what are some specific ways that the completion of this railway will boost the US economy?
ReplyDeleteI think that the analysis of cost vs benefits is important for this project. Determining whether it is more important to complete the project or to stop construction could be a responsibility left up to the new Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). I agree with the points you mentioned that the project should be completed as the benefits will be substantial for the economy. I believe that under Trump a decision will be made on the project and it will be interesting to see whether the job is completed or the project is terminated.
ReplyDeleteI think there is something to be said about questioning the benefits of projects. Personally, I would assume the railway's benefits will outweigh the costs, but maybe that could change with a broader view.
ReplyDelete